The Philippine election is just around the corner. Since the
country gained independence from the United States, it has been the practice of
some churches through their priests or religious leaders to endorse or oppose
the election of candidates for public office. At present, some priests of the
Catholic Church are endorsing or opposing the election of some senatorial
candidates over the Reproductive Health (RH) Law. People are also expecting
that within several days the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC), a minority but strong and
solid sect will publicly announce its endorsement of senatorial bets. Members
of this sect are known for voting as a bloc during election.
Despite the fact that RH Bill is already a law, the Catholic
Church is still fighting against its implementation. It also vows to oppose measures
on matters that promote abortion, gay marriage and other social issues. Filipinos
look up to their religious leaders for moral guidance and spiritual enrichment.
Because of that role the church has been at odds with government leaders who
were dictatorial and corrupt. A case in point is the role played by the church
in denouncing the Marcos regime for its violations of human rights and other
excesses. Most people however are averse of the church interfering on their
right of suffrage or of priest engaging in partisan political activity.
Partisanship during the election may involve telling the members on whom to
vote during the election or telling the voters not to vote for some
candidates especially if it is done through the pulpit or publicly through the
radio and other media. There is no issue if a religious leader expresses his
voting preference in a private and personal forum or in a private conversation
with his flock, friends and acquaintances.
The involvement of religious leaders in partisan political
acts, and the practice of politicians in seeking the help of a religious leader
to boost their candidacy are not good since it may bring about undesirable
consequences. Politicians who think that they win because of the help of a
church through its leaders will be beholden to them so
that they may not make policies or enact laws that are detrimental to the
interest of that religious group. In return the religious group may turn a
blind eye to the inefficiency or the abuses of the powers that be.
If religious leaders can really make politicians win an election
because of their hold on their members, then they are a force to reckon with in
the Philippine society. Politicians would not dare to cross their path lest
they lost in the election. Under these circumstances said religious leaders can
exert its influence or pressure on officials in the important branches of the
government which are the legislative, executive and the judiciary. In exchange
of their votes and other support, these religious groups can also put their
members in high positions in the government because of their power and
connections. As a result, the principle of the separation of the church and the
state will be undermined because religious leaders can influence the affairs of the
government behind the scenes.
To improve the Philippine electoral process, legislators should
pass laws prohibiting religious leaders from endorsing or opposing the election
of candidates during election or from engaging in activities that are
politically partisan. Religious groups which insist to engage in partisan
political activities should be stripped of their tax-exempt status.
That should be the case, but these religious demigods think otherwise.
ReplyDeletethis is a good analysis on the elections. church and state are two separate thing. i hope you can read this article http://www.deped.gov.ph/index.php/news-updates/updates/partners-updates/302-deped-renews-partnership-with-rappler-for-2013-palaro
ReplyDelete