Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

Saturday, October 18, 2025

Vietnam War: The Defeat of the United States and Its Abandonment of South Viet Nam

 

ARVN rangers in action
         

The Viet Nam War is a military struggle fought from 1959 to 1975. The World War II brought about the occupation of Viet Nam by the Japanese forces. After the war, the French wanted to regain its former colonial territories in Indo China that included Viet Nam. The communist forces however, under Ho Chi Minh wanted the country to become independent. The opposing interest of the French and the communist nationalist led by Ho Chi Minh resulted to an armed conflict. The North Vietnamese forces under the leadership of Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap routed the French and captured its remaining soldiers after a 55-day siege at Dien Bien Phu. As a result, France agreed to withdraw all its forces in Viet Nam at the Geneva Conference of 1954.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   In the aftermath of the conflict under the conference Viet Nam was partitioned at the 17th parallel on May 8, 1954, and a reunification election of the country was to be held in 1956. The north under the leadership of Ho Chi Minh allied itself with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) and China. The South under the leadership of Ngo Dinh Diem allied itself with the United States and the west. Ho Chi Minh and the League for the Independence of Viet Nam wanted a unified country along the USSR-China ideological line. Diem on the other hand opposed reunification believing that the people of the north had no freedom to choose if election was held. In South Viet Nam there was an underground armed group called the National Liberation Front (NLF) also known as the Viet Cong.  The NLF which shared and supported the north’s aspiration engaged South Viet Nam’s army, the ARVN, in its bid to topple the southern government from within using guerilla tactics. The political instability in the south and the in-fighting of its leaders made the south highly vulnerable of being defeated by the north.

US Intervention and Escalation of the War

US marines in Vietnam

ARVN soldiers in action

A police chief executes a Vietcong in the street

To prevent the south from falling into the hands of the communists, the United States sent military advisers to assist the ARVN deal with the threats posed by North Viet Nam and the Viet Cong. In 1961 two helicopter companies composed of 400 soldiers arrived.  In 1962 the US soldiers’ strength stood at 11,200. Before the end of 1965 US combat strength was almost 200,000 and reached its highest peak in 1968 at 525,000. During the early stage of US involvement troops from Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Thailand and the Philippines augmented the US and ARVN forces. The allied forces were commanded by Gen William Westmoreland.   

A young US marine
                                                                  

In the south the war became a people’s war with guerilla fighters not easily distinguishable from non-combatants and most civilians were mobilized into some sort of active participation. There were no recognizable front lines, and the Viet Cong employed highly effective hit and run tactics against the US forces and their allies. The war resulted in heavy casualties on both sides but majority of them were civilians.  Heavy aerial bombings were conducted by US planes to the north as well as in the Ho Chi Min Trail that was inside Laos and Cambodia where the communist transported their military supplies from the north into South Viet Nam.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               The most notable battle in the conflict was the Tet Offensive of the communists which they coincided with the celebration of the Vietnamese Lunar New Year, hence its name. The communist forces launched a coordinated and massive simultaneous attack against 100 urban targets inside South Viet Nam.  The US forces and the ARVN however were able to thwart the attack and defeated the communist assault and sent the enemies back to their former positions. In that attack the communists lost about 85,000 of their best troops.

A wounded US soldier assisted by his comrades

Media Coverage and Anti-War Demonstrations in the Streets Fanned Out Anti-War Sentiment

Victims of MY Lai massacre

The Viet Nam war was a war that was highly covered by the media. The long drawn armed conflict, the reports of atrocities, the huge casualties suffered by the US troops and the huge cost of prosecuting the war which stood at 25 billion dollars per year had created negative sentiment of the war on the American public overtime. Media reports highlighted atrocities committed by US forces while those of the communists were either ignored or not reported at all. The way in which the war was portrayed by the media played into the hands of the communists. The report of the My Lai Massacre in 1968 on which a platoon led by Lt. William Calley killed unarmed villagers composed of elderly men, women and children further put the conduct of the war in negative light.

The Kissinger Peace Deal: Setting the Stage for Communist Victory

Operation in Hue 1967

North Vietnamese troops during Tet Offensive

President Richard M. Nixon ordered continuous aerial bombings in the north to destroy its economic and military infrastructures and to bring the enemy to the negotiating table. But the communists remained adamant. Determined to reach a peace settlement with North Vietnam and put an end to the war, President Richard Nixon sent Henry Kissinger as his emissary to broker a peace deal with the communists in Paris. Kissinger’s communist counterpart was Le Dhuc Tho. Meanwhile, the US continued its bombing runs to make the communists agree with the peace deal. When a peace talk collapsed in December 16, 1972, Nixon ordered massive bombings of Hanoi and Haiphong by B-52s and other planes. On January 27, 1973, in Paris delegation from US, South Vietnam, North Viet Nam and the provisional revolutionary government signed agreement of ending the war and restoring peace. Among the conditions of the Peace accord were: complete cessation of hostilities, withdrawal of all US and allied forces from South Viet Nam within 60 days after the signing, return of POWs on both sides at 15-day intervals within 60 days, recognition of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) as provisional not a political or territorial boundary, creation of international control commission  composed of Canada, Hungary, Indonesia and Poland to oversee implementation of the peace accord, and a provision for an international conference to be held within 30 days. The accord allowed some 145,000 North Vietnamese troops to remain in South Vietnam, but with limitation on their future replacement and supplies. South Viet Nam under President Nguyen Van Thieu viewed the peace deal with apprehension. He considered it as a sellout to the communists. However, since his country was totally dependent to the United States for support, he nevertheless signed it. By the end of March 1973 all US troops were withdrawn from South Viet Nam.                                                                              

Henry Kissinger along with Le Dhuc Tho was nominated for the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize for bringing about peace in Viet Nam. But only Kissinger was awarded because Le Dhuc Tho refused to receive the prize stating that lasting peace was yet to be attained. Tho might have correctly thought that larger battles loomed ahead beyond that peace deal.                                                                                                                   

Vietnamization and the Abandonment of an Ally

The process of turning over the burden of military operations and security of South Viet Nam to the indigenous Vietnamese allies was called Vietnamization. In that process the United States would continue giving financial and material support to South Viet Nam after the US forces had left. Nixon hinted that America would come to the aid of South Viet Nam if the communists violated the terms of the treaty.                                                                                                                                                                               

The Vietnamization of the war did not bode well to the fledgling South Vietnamese government. The complete withdrawal of the US troops affected the economy because the country derived most of its income from the spending of American troops. The Yom Kippur War of 1973, which sent the price of oil to an unprecedented highest level also adversely affected its economy as well as its military capability. The high cost of oil made it more expensive for the country to use the planes, tanks and other equipment that were left behind by the US military.

The changing political landscape in the United States sealed the fate of South Viet Nam in its war against its Northern brother and neighbor. The anti-war sentiment in America was heightened by the continuous demonstrations in the streets against the war. Nixon resigned amidst the Watergate Scandal. Replacing him was Gerald Ford another republican. The mid-term election of 1974 saw majority of democrats winning the upper and lower houses of congress. The Democratic controlled congress made a resolution to phase out war funding. It was to be decreased in 1975 and to be cut off in 1976. And there was the Case-Church Amendment in June 1974 which prohibited US intervention in case of re-escalation of the war. The politicians virtually drove the final nail in the coffin as far as fate of the war in Viet Nam was concerned.

Violation of the Peace Treaty and the Victory of the Communists

When the American troops were gone the communist forces started to violate the peace deal that was made with Henry Kissinger. The North Vietnamese forces and the Viet Cong started to attack South Vietnamese positions. It seemed that all conditions set forth in the peace treaty were violated except the complete withdrawal of the US forces. In December 1974 North Vietnamese forces attacked route 14 in Phuc Long province. It fell on January 6, 1975. The South Vietnamese made a last-ditch effort to ask help from the United States. President Ford tried to answer the South Vietnamese call for help before they would be completely overrun, but his hands were tied by congress, and no help to an ally was forthcoming. On April 30, 1975, Saigon, the capital, was captured and the republic of Viet Nam surrendered unconditionally to the communist controlled provisional government.  At the end of 1975 the war had become a rout.

The defeat of the United States and the fall of Viet Nam came with a heavy price. It cost 57,685 Americans killed and 153,303 wounded with a financial cost of about 140 billion US dollars which is equivalent to 686 billion of today’s US dollars. On the side of the South Vietnamese there were estimated 2 million killed and 3 million wounded with hundreds of thousands orphaned. There were also 12 million Indo-Chinese people who became refugees because of the war. On the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong there were estimated 1,176,000 killed and over 600,000 wounded.

 Related posts:

The Top American Field Commanders in the Vietnam War http://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-top-american-field-commanders-in.html

Vo Nguyen Giap, the Vietnamese General Who Humbled Western Powers https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2012/08/vo-nguyen-giap-vietnamese-general-who.html


Saturday, December 12, 2015

GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump- Love Him or Hate Him

Donald Trump (photo credit: Gage Skidmore)
With his bold and heavily controversial statements on public issues, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump draws attention not only from the American public but also from his rivals from the Republican and Democratic Parties. The outspoken billionaire always minces no words in his statements in answers to questions asked of him.

On December 8, 2015, in the aftermath of the San Bernardino shooting involving Islamic terrorists, Donald Trump made statements suggesting to “ban Muslims from entering the United States unless its representatives can figure out what is going on.” He then immediately got a lot of criticism over his words. Hilary Clinton, a Democratic Party presidential candidate commented that Trump’s remarks are “shameful” and “dangerous” and that he is playing into the hands of the ISIS by supplying it with new propaganda. Her view was echoed by the Pentagon which voiced concern on the security implication on Trump’s remarks. Fearing a backlash to the party over Trump’s comment, Republican Party presidential candidates also rebuked him. Jeb Bush, another republican presidential candidate said that Trump’s action is helping Clinton to win the presidency, and that Trump is not going to be the Republican Party nominee for president. In the academe, on December 9, 2015, the Robert Gordon University revoked Trump’s Honorary Doctorate of Business Administration for making statements that are incompatible with the ethos and values of the school.                                                
Donald Trump also received a lot of flak abroad over his anti-Muslim rhetoric. British Prime Minister David Cameroon, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls and Canadian Foreign Minister Stephanie Dion also expressed their criticism. In addition there is a petition in the UK which already gained half a million signatures to ban Trump in the country.

Despite the attacks leveled against him over his anti-Muslim and anti-immigration stance, Trump remains defiant and says that he will stand by with what he said. Latest opinion survey by Huffpost pollster conducted after his controversial remarks shows that his popularity in the Republican Party has not  diminished. He still leads the republican presidential hopefuls with 35.6%. His closest rivals Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio got only 14.1% and 12.3% respectively.

Donald Trump joined the presidential race with official slogan: “We are going to make our country great again.”, and commitment “to become the greatest president that God created.” His proposed policies as president include the deportation of 11 million immigrants from the United States, the construction of a substantial wall on the US-Mexican borders, and the aggressive bombings of the ISIS. He would also support the surveillance of mosques in the US.

Most often, Trump’s statements don’t sit well with the illegal immigrants to include the Syrian refugees and even the liberals. Though there are some people who disagree with his view, there are others who appreciate Trump’s candidness to speak his mind on controversial issues. He says what he feels without being constrained with political correctness. His supporters believe that his views reflect the sentiments of the majority of the Americans.  

You like him or not, Donald Trump if ever he would be elected as the next president of the United States would likely bring significant changes in the country’s policies and direction especially on matters such as immigration and the war on terrorism which are some of the key issues that could sway voters’ preference in the coming US presidential election of 2016. And the world would see a shift from a liberal oriented administration into one with conservative leanings.


Wednesday, October 1, 2014

The Social Media and the Battle against the ISIS


The rise of the ISIS and its battle against the governments of Syria and Iraq and the Kurds and other armed groups has caught the curiosity and attention of people around the world. Negative news reports on ISIS members’ actions in combats and their treatment of captives and civilians have horrified many people.

Aside from the physical battle, the parties to the conflict also take into account its psychological dimension to boost the war effort. In this regard, the social media particularly Facebook and Twitter has become an unwitting tool or a venue for the battle to win the people’s hearts and minds in the conflict involving ISIS and its opponents.

Concerned of the bad publicity it has brought to Islam since the ISIS claims that it has carried out its act in the name of the religion, leaders of Saudi Arabia and religious clerics as well as some Islamic association of America and Europe have denounced the ISIS stating that the actions and behavior of its members are not compatible with the tenets of Islam. In fact Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Jordan have joined the US led coalition to provide airstrike against the ISIS’ members and their facilities. Other western countries such as the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Netherlands and Australia have also given support to the forces that are fighting the ISIS such as the Kurds and the Iraqi army.

In a battle, the side which has a superior firepower, proficient and well motivated troops as well as good commanders usually prevails over its weaker opponent. However, the battle to win the people’s hearts and minds including those of the non-combatants cannot be overlooked. This is proven in the American defeat in the Vietnam War. And in the Arab Spring the social media particularly Facebook and Twitter was a tool that galvanized world opinion against state of affairs in the Middle East. The use of the social media stoked the flame of people’s revolt that toppled down long serving and well entrenched autocratic rulers such as the late Col. Muammar Khadafy of Libya and former President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt.
    
Appalled by the atrocities of the ISIS, some internet users are bringing their opinion and sentiments against it in the internet. Some formed groups in Facebook with the aim of denouncing the ISIS and of giving users updates on news and on the battle that is raging on between the ISIS and the Kurds and other forces opposing it such as the Iraqi and Syrian armies.

The opposition to ISIS is gaining momentum in the social media. And the post and the interaction of users about the ISIS could somehow influence world opinion for or against it. A group such as the ISIS that wants people to submit to their wishes and demands through sheer acts of terror cannot possibly win the hearts and minds of the people in the world.


Wednesday, September 24, 2014

The Brutalities of the ISIS


Waging jihad to establish Islamic caliphate, the ISIS emerges as the most fearsome and well funded terrorist organization in the world. Its ferocity and determination have made it conquer large swath of lands in Syria and Iraq. During a battle Iraqi security forces fled from engagement leaving behind large quantity of weapons given to them by the Americans. The bonanza of American weapons and their initial military victories were a big boost to the morale of the ISIS fighters.

The advance of the ISIS has displaced thousands of indigenous population. Its onslaught created a flow of refugees in Northern Iraq and the Turkish borders. The ISIS which is mostly composed of Sunnis is at odds with the local Shiites, and armed confrontations are common occurrence between them. Conquering an area, the ISIS militants give the minorities such as the Christians and the Yazidis to convert to Islam or be killed. In areas that fell under their control after a military operation, the militants imposed harsh actions to the local populace. Women and children are separated from the men. The men including older male children are then killed execution style. The method of execution includes shooting, beheading and crucifying. Captured or kidnapped women are then raped or made as sex slaves. Selected young women are gifted to ISIS commanders as “wives”. Captured children are trained to become “holy warriors” or suicide bombers.

The US and western nations airstrikes have given the Kurds, the Iraqi security forces and other local militias a breathing space to deal with the ISIS. The Peshmerga the Kurdish armed forces which took the brunt of the fighting were able to recapture lost grounds. With US air support and weapons supplied by France and other European nations' the Kurds stalled or halted the ISIS advance into their territory.

Getting back at the Americans, the ISIS beheaded two American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff in an effort to intimidate them and their allies. France which is active in the campaign against the terror group was also given a warning that its citizens will be targeted.

Despite the US air strikes, the ISIS militants have shown their superiority over local adversaries especially the Iraqi security forces. In the middle of September 2014, ISIS militants besieged an Iraqi army unit guarding a strategic supply route in Western Anbar. Suicide bombers dressed as Iraqi soldiers on bomb-laden Humvee vehicles drove through an army camp and detonated the bombs into the Iraqi soldiers’ positions. The explosions inflicted heavy casualties to the surprised Iraqi army. Amid the chaos and confusion that ensued, the militants then assaulted and overran the camp and killed as many as 250 Iraqi soldiers. Those who were not killed were captured or were able to escape. It is estimated that the Iraqi security forces lost about 500 of its troops that are listed as either killed or missing in that battle.

The brutalities of the ISIS have made some leaders and clerics of Muslim world such as Saudi Arabia to denounce the group. They stated that the group’s actions are disgrace to the Islamic faith and are not compatible with the principles of Islam. And that the ISIS does not represent the Muslims. Putting their money where their mouths are, Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Bahrain with Qatar in supporting role have joined the coalition of countries that conducted airstrikes against the ISIS in Syria.


Friday, March 15, 2013

The Philippine Commonwealth, a Transition Government Leading to Philippine Independence


Pres. Manuel L. Quezon
Since it annexed the Philippines in 1898 as an unincorporated territory, the United States observed and acknowledged the fervent aspiration of the Filipinos to have a free and independent nation. To this end, the American congress enacted in 1932 the Hares-Hawes-Cuttings Act setting specific date of Philippine independence. US President Herbert Hoover vetoed the bill. The congress however overrode the president’s veto and the bill became an act. However, during that time a law pertaining to an unincorporated US territory had to first get the approval of the legislative body such as the senate in the case of the Philippines to become enforceable. Philippine Senate President Manuel L. Quezon opposed the act because of its objectionable provisions such as the imposition of tariffs and quota on Philippine exports to the US and the reservation for American military bases in the Philippines.

Another law was crafted in the US to change the Hares-Hawes-Cuttings act. It was called the Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934. Little changes to the provisions of the Hares-Hawes-Cuttings act made the Tydings-McDuffie Act acceptable to the Philippine senate.  It was then signed by the US president and became a law, and the prospect for an independent Philippines became a reality.                                      

The Tydings-McDuffie Act gave the Philippines a 10-year transition period before independence. And until then the Philippines was a commonwealth. Executive powers would be handed over by the American governor-general to the new Philippine president. Taking the place of the governor-general was the High Commissioner of the US to the Philippines who was adviser to the Philippine President on matters involving the two countries. In the interim period, the Philippines would have two elected resident commissioners to the US to act as non-voting Philippine representatives to the US congress.  
                        
Pres. Sergio Osmena
A constitutional convention in 1934 was called in Manila. The convention approved a new constitution on February 8, 1935, and was signed by US President Franklin Roosevelt on March 23, 1935. The constitution was ratified by a popular vote on May 14, 1935. The first Philippine Presidential Election was held on September 17, 1935. Manuel L. Quezon was elected as the first president for a one six-year term.  Winning the vice presidency was Sergio Osmeña.  At first the type of legislature under the constitution was unicameral, but it was later amended into a bicameral legislature. Foreign affairs and military matters were the responsibility of the United States and some legislation required the approval of the US president. In his presidency, Quezon’s advisers included General Douglas MacArthur who was a US High Commissioner. The latter had a rank of field marshal of the Philippines.                            

The attack of the Japanese of the American naval base in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7, 1941 precipitated the entry of the United States into WW II. Japanese planes bombed Central Luzon in the Philippines on December 8, 1941. With the advance of the Japanese forces to Manila, General MacArthur declared it as an "open city" to spare it from destruction that might result in battles. American and Filipino forces surrendered to the Japanese in May 1942.                                                                                              

The progress made by the Japanese forces in the war, made Quezon and some of his top government officials move his seat of government to Corregidor. Later, Quezon with his top government officials joined Macarthur in del Monte, Bukidnon and from there they flew to Australia. Quezon proceeded to the United States where he set up his government-in- exile.  On August 1, 1944, Quezon died of tuberculosis at Saranac Lake, New York. Sergio Osmeña took his place as the commonwealth president in exile.

In the absence of the legitimate Philippine government, the Japanese occupation forces set up a government called the Second Republic of the Philippines with Jose P. Laurel as the appointed President. This government turned out to be unpopular because the Filipinos hated the Japanese occupation forces.

In 1943, the tide of battle changed in favor of the Americans and the allied forces in the Asia-Pacific theater of war. The Japanese forces suffered huge losses in terms of personnel and equipment and they were pushed every which way by the advancing allied forces. General Douglas MacArthur along with President Sergio Osmeña returned to the Philippines and arrived in Leyte on October 20, 1944.                                                                                                                                                      

The dropping of atomic bombs in the twin Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945 respectively made Japan surrender unconditionally to the allied forces led by the Americans on August 14,1945. That act formally ended the war in Asia and the Pacific.                                      

With the end of the war, the commonwealth government was restored, and a presidential election was held. The incumbent president Osmeña was the candidate of the Nacionalista Party. His opponent was Manuel Roxas of the Liberal Party. Osmeña refused to campaign believing that his 40 years of dedicated and honorable services to the country were enough to bring him to victory. In contrast, Roxas made a vigorous campaign for the presidency which eventually rewarded him of winning the election in 1946.   
                                                
Pres. Manuel Roxas
Despite the interruption of the war, the Philippines would meet its timetable for independence. The historic and memorable day came on July 4, 1946. The commonwealth had ended and a new era of an independent Philippines began. In the grand ceremony, Manuel Roxas declared the independence of the country and retook his oath as its president. The event was attended by top Philippine and American officials including some foreign dignitaries and was witnessed by about 400,000 spectators. The lowering of the American flag and the raising of the Philippine flag was accompanied with the clangs of church bells and the cheers of crowds. The waving of the Philippine flag in the air signified the Filipinos’ realized aspiration for independence and the hope for a better tomorrow.


Related posts:

Philippine Commonwealth Government of President Manuel L. Quezon Helped 1,200 Jews Escape the Holocaust https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2013/03/philippine-commonwealth-government-of.html

The Philippine Government during the Colonial Period and the American Governors-General https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-philippine-government-during.html

The Historic Philippine-United States Relationship and the Philippine Independence https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-historic-philippine-united-states.html

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

The Philippine Government during the American Colonial Period and the American Governors-General

President William McKinley
Spain ceded the Philippines in 1898 after the Spanish-American War. President William McKinley appointed a Philippine Commission on January 20, 1899 to exercise legislative and limited executive powers over islands whose people were still recovering from the ravages of armed revolution and wars. At that time an American military governor appointed by the US president was the head of the commission who held executive authority. A second Philippine Commission in 1901 paved the way for the setting up of judicial system, a supreme court, and an elected government in the municipal and provincial levels. Executive powers were exercise by an American civil governor who had executive departments.   The title of the governor was later changed to governor-general pursuant to an act of US congress.                                                                                                  

The Philippine Organic Act of July 1, 1902 which was approved by the US congress called for the creation of Philippine Assembly whose members were popularly elected by the Filipinos. In the new government set up the colonial government had a bicameral legislature. The Philippine Assembly was the lower house while the US president appointed Philippine Commission served as the upper house. The Philippine Commission also acted as an executive body with the US president appointed governor-general as its head. Other features of the Philippine Organic Act included the disestablishment of the Catholic Church and the appointment of two Filipinos as resident commissioners of the Philippines to the US to act as non-voting representatives of the Philippines to the US congress. During that time, in the US, matters concerning the 
Philippines were dealt by the Bureau of Insular affairs which oversaw unincorporated American territories.

The Jones Law or the Philippine Autonomy Act which was enacted in the US congress on August 29, 1916, provided for an elected upper house and lower house in the Philippine bicameral legislative body. In effect it created the Philippine senate which replaced the Philippine Commission. On March 24, 1934, the US congress passed Tydings-McDuffie Act which granted self government and independence to the Filipinos after a ten-year transition period. Under that act the Philippines became a commonwealth and the executive authority of the American governor-general was passed on to a Filipino president. Relative to the new law, the title of governor-general was changed to High Commissioner to the Philippines until 1946 when the Philippines gained independence from the United States pursuant to Tydings-McDuffie Act. However, the function of the commissioner was only ceremonial and advisory since executive power was vested to the Filipino president. Manuel L. Quezon was the first president of the Philippine Commonwealth.

During the American colonial period there were 4 military governors, two civil governors and 11 governors- general.  Three were holding the position in acting capacity. The most distinguished governor-general was William Howard Taft who became the 27th president of the United States. He was also the first civil governor of the Philippines during the American colonial period.  The first military governor was Wesley Merritt who briefly served from August 14-29 1898. The longest serving American governor- general was Francis Burton Harrison who held the office for more than 7 years. Also of note were Lt. Gen Arthur MacArthur, the father of legendary American general Douglas MacArthur and Theodore Roosevelt Jr., the eldest son of US President Theodore Roosevelt.

William Howard Taft
Theodore Roosevelt Jr.
Arthur MacArthur Jr.
Francis Burton Harrison
List of American governors-general in the Philippines during the American colonial period*
Name
From
Until
Military Governors
Wesley Merritt
August 14, 1898
August 29, 1898
Elwell Otis
August 30, 1898
May 5, 1900
Arthur MacArthur Jr.
May 5, 1900
July 14, 1901
Adna Chaffee
July 4, 1901
July 4, 1902
Governors
William Howard Taft
July 4, 1901
February 1, 1904
Luke Edward Wright
February 1, 1904
November 3, 1905
Governors-General
Henry Clay Ide
November 3, 1905
September 19, 1906
James Francis Smith
September 20, 1906
November 11, 1909
William Cameron Forbes
November 11, 1909
September 1, 1913
Newton W. Gilbert (acting)
September 1, 1913
October 6, 1913
Francis Burton Harrison
October 6, 1913
March 5, 1921
Charles Yeater (acting)
March 5, 1921
October 14, 1921
Leonard Wood
October 14, 1921
August 7, 1927
Eugene Allen Gilmore (acting)
August 7, 1927
December 27, 1927
Henry L. Stimson
December 27, 1927
February 23, 1929
Eugene Allen Gilmore (acting)
February 23, 1929
July 8, 1929
Dwight F. Davis
July 8, 1929
January 9, 1932
George C. Butte (acting)
January 9, 1932
February 29, 1932
Theodore Roosevelt Jr.
February 29, 1932
July 15, 1933
Frank Murphy
July 15, 1933
November 15, 1935

*Cahoon, Ben (2000), “Philippines”
Photos (public domain) via Wikipedia

Related posts:

Philippine Commonwealth Government of President Manuel L. Quezon Helped 1,200 Jews Escape the Holocaust https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2013/03/philippine-commonwealth-government-of.html

The Philippine Commonwealth, a Transition Government Leading to Philippine Independence https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-philippine-commonwealth-transition.html

The Historic Philippine-United States Relationship and the Philippine Independence https://lapasan-myblognoel145.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-historic-philippine-united-states.html